Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Governments Should Scrap Pensions And Go To 401Ks

The following was sent to the Mount Dora city council, but it pertains to many political subdivisions including Omaha, Nebraska where I also reside.

  Overly generous plans, investment losses, and optimistic investment assumptions
  have resulted in underfunded plans and the possibility of tax increases.  The  
problem exists in most public bodies and needs  to be addressed.    At this point it will 
only cause interested parties to dig their heels in if the  discussion centers on how we got here
 and who the advocates were. It's enought  to know that the city's pension obligations are 
seriously underfunded and have  been growing much faster than the cost of living. If not resolved,
 the impact on  Mount Dora  will be higher taxes and a larger percentage of city revenues devoted
 to  retirement expense and less to other areas.   

 Before I opine too grandly, at least some background. Before retirement I was  president of two
 commercial banks and owner of several businesses with several  hundred employees. I'm a 
Mount Dora citizen and spend over half the year in our  fine city. My companies didn't have 
defined benefit pension plans  and neither  did any of  our competitors. They became relics 
25 years ago. Business didn't abandon the  defined benefit plans to reduce employee comfort 
in retirement, they eliminated  them to reduce risk of the unknown, including poor investment 
performance,  poorly written plans, and employee abuse. Private business, except for some huge  
companies, has moved to a 401K match approach. The employer still contributes a  large amount
 of retirement money and the employee controls his own retierment  investments. The risk of 
poor performance stays with the employee and there are  no plan loopholes to abuse. The employee 
owns and controls the assets and can  pass any remaining investments to his/her heirs.    

I think the city should move in the direction of a defined contribution plan,  401K-ish, which 
would allow more accurate budgeting and consistent taxation. We  can't use a mulligan on past
 errors or mistakes, so employees are due what is  accrued. But we can end the plans, provide 
an equivalent annuity for what the  employee has earned to date, and start a defined contribution
 plan. Let's cap  our exposure and not count on outsized investment gains to bring us back into 
a  funded position while continuing to accrue benefits at a rate that far exceeds  the inflation
 rate.    I hope this is of some value as you discuss the issue and manage the city's  finances.

No comments:

Post a Comment